July 21, 2017 Dragon 0Comment

ContentAttempted Appeal

At a Glance

Story/Testimony

Evidence

Reported by onebadrandom and Kakarrot

CONCLUDING DECISION

Play Pr0 shall not have his case appealed.

Play Pro must pay the full amount of wealth initially specified in his case.

The case has thus far been conducted fairly.

Original appeal content:

Should Play Pr0’s case be appealed?

SUMMARY

Team of 4 go on a trip to corp. One of them (Play Pro) leaves early. One of them (Altay) receives Ely drop. Altay doesn’t split it with the other two – only with Play Pro, who hadn’t even been there, having left early. Victims witness Altay trading Play Pro afterward. Altay logs out. The two remaining victims thus accuse both Altay and Play Pro of scamming the Ely.

WHAT ENSUED

Play Pr0 speaks out, trying to defend himself. He states openly “we scammed them together.” While now admitting to the incriminating nature of his statement, he insists that it was taken out of context and that what he actually meant was “I was inevitably involved in the scam by way of receiving a share of the drop.” In other words, he says he stood in a neutral position, simply receiving a share of the drop which he thought he was entitled to and IN THAT SENSE it may be said that they “Scammed together.” Other than within that sense of involvement, Play Pro pleads not guilty. He also claims to have only received 50m from Altay at the time of the trade.

The victims, their clan leader and Zeale from RS Justice have been working on this case in full cooperation with all parties, including the accused. Due to the personal convictions that Play Pro, the accused, was guilty in pursuit of the statement he made, Play Pro has thus far been sort of “tricked” into paying more and more until he paid the full amount. At this time the amount has reached 130m in returned gp, 50m of which still needs to be returned to the victims, currently in Zeale’s possession. Zeale has felt it necessary to involve the full staff team in this case in order to determine where this case is going and indeed, whether it has been conducted fairly thus far.

CONFLICTING POINTS IN THE STORY

Victims claim Play Pro had been out of the room for over 30 minutes before the Ely was dropped. Play Pro insists that it had only been 1 kill since he left, not 30 minutes. Wether this is significant to the outcome of things is, of course, up to individual opinion.

FACTS

  • Play Pro was NOT in the room at the time of the drop
  • Play Pro traded Altay sometime after the Ely was dropped
  • Play Pro is still friends with Altay
  • Play Pro admittedly shares his account with a friend

THE DECISION

3/5 Majority Vote Required for a decision to pass

CURRENT VOTE SCORE: 1 IN FAVOR | 4 NOT IN FAVOR

ALL EVIDENCE IS TO BE EXAMINED CLOSELY BY STAFF IN ORDER TO MAKE AN INFORMED DECISION.

Zeale must abstain from voting in this decision.

First Vote by Staff member Jumanji: IN FAVOR OF APPEAL
Second Vote by Staff member Anthmelo: NOT IN FAVOR OF APPEAL
Third Vote by Staff member Domina: NOT IN FAVOR OF APPEAL
Fourth Vote by Staff member Mack: NOT IN FAVOR OF APPEAL
Fifth Vote by Staff member Hero Vinny: NOT IN FAVOR OF APPEAL
 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.